logo blue


Items starting with O

Object Theatre (N)

"Object theatre" is an exhibition strategy, akin to the old-fachioned sound and light show, which uses computer technologies to create multimedia and multi-sensory contexts for museum objects. They are designed to bring objects to life without necessitating a hands-on experience. "

From: Storytelling, the real work of Museums, by Leslie Bedford, 2001

 

Oral Education (N)

Oral education, or oralism, focused on teaching deaf children to communicate through speech and lipreading. Sign language was discouraged or actively forbidden. 

 

A Dutch historical video (date unknown) of teaching speech to young deaf children (click on the picture to see the video):

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oralism#:~:text=Oralism%20is%20the%20education%20of,States%20around%20the%20late%201860s.

Oral History (N)

The personal recollections of people who participated in historical events.

 

Orphan works (N)

"Orphan works are works in copyright where the rights holders are either unknown or cannot be traced. (..)

Due to their nature, the requirements of copyright law and the lack of fit for purpose solutions, orphan works represent a massive issue for the mass digitisation and publication (including online) of assets owned by cultural heritage institutions across Europe. 

For many years, risk management has provided the only possible option for cultural heritage institutions to make their orphan works available online. 

(..)

A checklist for risk management 

It is important to stress that risk management is an institutional choice. It should always be carefully considered against any likely risks and costs, as well as documented. If your institution decides to reproduce its orphan works, then the following risk assessment checklist could be useful:

  • Keep records of all attempts made to contact the rights holders.

  • Accompany the reproduction of orphan works with attribution statements where known.

  • Introduce notice and take down policies and procedures to enable the removal of orphan works should the rights holders come forward.

  • Reproduce images in low resolution.

  • Assess the specific risks of reproducing orphan works on a case by case basis, for example, according to the type of work, subject matter and age, to reduce the risk of high profile rights holders coming forward.  

  • Restrict any use to 'Non-Commercial research or private study.'

  • Put money aside in case rights holders come forward and/or take out insurance

  • Carry out reasonable searches. These can include image Recognition Software – use free sites like TinEye and Advanced Google Search.

  • Check the acknowledgements and notes of published works/exhibition catalogues about the author.

  • Check the internet for information about the creator of the material and keep a record of all searches where appropriate.

  • Check the WATCH file on the Internet for information about artists and writers (entered through WATCH). 

  • Check other organisations which might hold works by that artist/creator and contact them to see whether they can provide any information about the rights holder.

  • Check with collecting societies.

  • Establish whether the work has been lent/bequeathed/given by the rights holder. If so, can the person who gave the material provide any contact information for the rights holder?

  • Check whether the material is held in a Picture Library or stock photography agency.

  • Check if the work by an academic, student, member of support staff or anyone else directly (or indirectly) connected with your organisation.

  • Place an advert in a relevant trade journal or magazine in order to trace the rights holder.

  • If the artist or author is still living, then you may be able to find their contact address through online directory enquiries."

 

Source: https://pro.europeana.eu/post/orphan-works-and-uk-glams-the-case-for-a-risk-managed-approach

Ownership (N)

Ownership is very important for museums. Who owns the artefacts? Who tells the stories?

A very simplified, very short summary of what's involved:

In the past, explorers travelled to new worlds (new for them), by boat, on foot, or carried by horses, camels, elephants or humans.

The explorers saw many wonderful things there and took some of them home to show them to the people in their own country, in museums and zoos. 'Things' included objects, art, animals, even people. 'Taking' included: receiving as gifts, buying, or stealing.

The stories that the museums told about these 'things' were told from the perspective of the explorers. Dates and locations may have been correct, but many of the stories were not. Slowly, museums changed and added more information. They started to consult the previous 'owners', the people who had made these objects, used them, knew their histories.

Then, two things happened. The previous owners wanted their objects back, to put them on display in their own museums for their own people. And they wanted to tell their own stories, from their perspective. Not as consultants, but as the rightful owners and experts.
Developments that are still ongoing, that have many more sides and and no 'one size fits all' solution.

The same things have been happening, are happening, with respect to the Deaf community. In the past, their history was told by hearing people, from the hearing perspective. Then, Deaf people became involved as consultants. Now some Deaf people want their objects, stories, histories returned to the Deaf community, because Deaf people are the rightful owners and experts.

Again, there is no 'one size fits all' solution.
In theory, on paper, the best solution of course is for Deaf and hearing experts to work together, to teach each other, to learn from each other,  to acknowledge and benefit from each others expertise. In the real world, unfortunately, things may be more complicated.

Further reading: https://www.museumnext.com/article/what-does-it-mean-to-decolonize-a-museum/